Vacation is Over, Back to Writing

We’ve safely made back to the swamp from Troll mountain, and the ooze is feeling extra nice between my toes.  My feet were drying out up there, it’s no wonder the Trolls are cranky.  All is quiet around the swamp, the zombies are happily grazing on unsuspecting folks brains.  My muse has his tool belt on and it’s time to get serious about improving my  craft.

I am always drawn to books that are character driven.  I want to know who I’m on the path with when I journey into the pages of a book.  To that end I’m reading three books on enneagrams so that I may better understand my characters.  The enneagram is a system for identifying the nine personality types: Perfectionist, Nurturer, Achiever, Romantic, Observer, Skeptic, Adventurer, Leader, and Peacemaker.

In my quest to know and understand the characters who inhabit my novel I’ve learned that being true to a personality type can be tricky.  All personalities respond to stimuli differently, but the same personality can also respond to the same stimuli in a different way.  For instance an achiever will work very hard to be seen in a good light and be liked, or the achiever can be deceptive and strive for the appearance of a hard worker and a good friend.  The great thing about writing fiction is I get to decide if he’s going to be a hero or a jerk.  How fun is that?  This is what makes character driven novels great, no one is all good or all bad, even the antagonist needs a motive.  He can’t be evil for evils sake.  Somewhere inside he believes the greater good will be served if all teenage romance vampire novelists, were tossed into a wood chipper.  (Wait that’s a good thing right? Sorry I digress.)

All personalities are influenced by the personality connecting them on the enneagram to some extent, and this too causes them to respond differently to a situation.  As with real people characters can be influenced by experience.  ”It hurts when I stick hand in the wood chipper, won’t do that again.”

Two of the books I’m reading are self-help style books giving the reader a test to find his or her personality type.  The third was written for writers and it takes a less in-depth look into each one type.  It provides an overview of the enneagram technique and describes the strengths and weaknesses of each type.  illustrating how a character will relate to another type and even opportunities for the character growth.  The problem with knowing everything about your character is you can’t put it all in the novel.  This, like all research needs to be carefully combed through and sprinkled throughout in small amounts. That of course, requires great discipline or a group of friends who can honestly critique your work.  Since discipline is a whole other topic and one I’m not the versed on I count my self fortunate to have the later.

The vertically challenged evil ones are a blessing and I can never be humble or grateful enough for the help they provide me.  so here is your heads up.  I might be including way to much personality detail in my coming submissions.  The book is ‘Believable Characters, Creating with Enneagrams’ by Laurie Schnebly.

I don’t usually do movie reviews, but as a writer I must say I enjoyed Midnight in Paris.  For all you aspiring writers I say go see it.  Warning there is NO BLOODSHED, OR GRATUITOUS SEX, but go see it anyway.

As is the custom I’ll leave you with this quote from Orson Wells in honor of the fourth of July.

“Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”

Write On,

Eerie

Armageddon, Dean Koontz and Odd Thomas

Well…we seem to have survived Harold Camping’s prediction of the end of the world. Either that or we’re one of the 200 million he said would survive. In any case, I held off publishing my Saturday rant just in case.

So back to writing. I’m currently trying to get my head around what makes the perfect protagonist. My fellow dwarves would have me believe all heroes should have a dark side. Besides saving fair damsels, they should have a bit of ‘nasty’ in them. Heroes who are nice and sweet provide no interest to readers they say.

Is that true?

Thinking back over many decades of reading—especially epic fantasy as well as other genres—I conclude there is a sliver of truth in current dwarf-think.

By the same token, I can think of many stories (perhaps even a majority) where the protagonist is indeed nice. Nice doesn’t deter the protagonist from killing bad guys, monsters, or other evil beings. Good versus evil can be taken literally in many classic stories.

By way of example, I would use Odd Thomas. Dean Koontz has used Odd Thomas in four books to date. Not once has he been anything other than good. He even spent am entire book as Brother Odd and lived in a monastery.

Is Odd Thomas an interesting character? I, along with millions of other readers, think so. He hangs out with the dead after all…

My conclusion is…when my characters have failed the ‘interesting’ test, it’s not simply because they don’t have a dark side. It’s because I’ve not properly built enough interest into them.

Smokey